Facebook chief Mark Zuckerberg admitted his firm needed to do more to tackle terrorism, hate speech and online bullying as he was questioned by MEPs.
Appearing before senior politicians in Brussels, Mr Zuckerberg also acknowledged the social media giant faced an “arms race” in efforts to prevent the platform being used to interfere in elections.
MEPs lined up to criticise Mr Zuckerberg, with one questioning whether he had created a “digital monster”.
In his opening statement, he again acknowledged Facebook had not done enough to prevent the spread of fake news, foreign interference in elections and the misuse of personal information.
“We didn’t take a broad enough view of our responsibility,” he said.
“That was a mistake and I am sorry for it. It is going to take time to work through all the changes that we need to make here but I am committed to getting this right.”
Manfred Weber the leader of the centre-right European People’s Party in the parliament, suggested Facebook had become too powerful and may have to be broken up.
Guy Verhofstadt, the leader of the Liberal group in the parliament, said Mr Zuckerberg was in danger of being remembered as “a genius who created a digital monster that is destroying our democracies and our societies”.
He compared Facebook to the banks in the run up to the global crash of 2008 and questioned whether it could resolve the problems itself.
Former Ukip leader Nigel Farage said that since since January, Facebook had changed its algorithms which directly led to a very substantial drop in views and engagements with those with right-of-centre political views.
“I am not taking here about extremism. I am not talking about encouraging violence. I am talking about people who have majority mainstream opinions and frankly I feel they are being wilfully discriminated against,” he said.
Diane Dodds of the DUP raised the case of 17-year-old Ronan Hughes from County Tyrone who took his own life in 2015 after online blackmailers tricked him into sending them into intimate pictures of himself.
“This is only one example of the rise of false accounts within Facebook,” she said.
“I would like you to tell us today what you are doing to stop the rise of false Facebook accounts which deliberately target young and vulnerable people.”
The format of the session in Brussels – which saw MEPs make statements and pose questions to Mr Zuckerberg, with the Facebook chief responding to their comments at the end – drew criticism for allowing the tech entrepreneur to escape without giving full answers.
Responding to the MEPs, Mr Zuckerberg said: “The bottom line here is that hate speech, bullying, terror, violence – all this content has no place on our services.
“But in order to really execute that we need to upgrade and do a better job of executing our policies.”
He said the firm was making greater use of artificial intelligence to detect offensive content.
Mr Zuckerberg also acknowledged that there were sophisticated attempts to interfere in elections “like the Russians were able to in the US presidential election in 2016”.
The Facebook boss told MEPs: “We will never be perfect on this. Our adversaries – especially on the election side – people who are trying to interfere who have access to some of the same AI tools that we will.
“It’s an arms race and we will need to constantly be working to stay ahead.”
He insisted Facebook faced competition from “new competitors coming up every day” and while it attracted 6% of global advertising, “clearly advertisers also have a lot of choice”.
He also highlighted the 18 million small businesses in Europe which use Facebook tools.
Mr Zuckerberg also maintained Facebook has “always paid the taxes that the law requires” and was making “significant investments” in EU economies.
Responding to the concerns raised by Mr Farage, he said: “We have never and will not make decisions about what content is allowed or how we do ranking on the basis of a political orientation.”
The Facebook boss has so far resisted attempts to call him to Westminster to answer MPs’ questions.
Damian Collins, chairman of the Commons’ Digital, Culture, Media and Sport committee, said the Brussels session was a “missed opportunity for proper scrutiny”.
“Unfortunately the format of questioning allowed Mr Zuckerberg to cherry-pick his responses and not respond to each individual point,” he said.
“I echo the clear frustration of colleagues in the room who felt the discussion was shut down.
“It is time that Mr Zuckerberg agreed to appear in front of the DCMS Committee to provide Facebook users the answers they deserve.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here