People wait for more than a year to give blood or stem cells after making an initial decision to donate, a poll suggests.
The Anthony Nolan charity said there is a 15-month “contemplation window” – from the moment people first consider donation to when they finally sign up.
A poll of 2,000 Britons found that 15% were registered as blood donors and 2.9% had donated stem cells or bone marrow, or were registered to do so.
The majority of registered stem cell donors said hectic work schedules and busy lives were to blame for the delay in signing up to the register.
Overall, the survey found that a third (31%) of Britons would consider donating their stem cells.
But according to Anthony Nolan, which holds a stem cell register matching donors to patients in need, only 2% of the UK population are registered as stem cell donors.
It said that decreasing the “contemplation window” could help increase the number of people on the stem cell register and improve the chances of finding the best match for patients who need a transplant.
The charity has launched its Be A Lifesaver campaign, which aims to encourage people to join the register, particularly young men.
Rebecca Pritchard, head of register development at Anthony Nolan, said: “We want people to take time to consider, and understand, the commitment they’re making when they join the Anthony Nolan register; however, right now, there’s a shortage of young men on the Anthony Nolan register ready to, potentially, save a life.
“Young men provide more than 55% of all stem cell donations but make up just 16% of the stem cell register; if we can encourage more young men to make the decision to join, we will be able to save even more lives.”
To find out more visit: www.anthonynolan.org/bealifesaver
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here