To say that the second fire in less than five years at the Glasgow School of Art is heartbreaking is an understatement.
This prestigious institution is a source of pride for Glasgow, and it is internationally acclaimed. The Mackintosh building, now ravaged by fire, kept the heartbeat of Charles Rennie Mackintosh’s art running through the city. It is a special place, and one that had seemed all the more so after it survived the first fire in 2014.
The fire of 2018, however, wreaked incredible damage on the building. It has been utterly devastated, and it will come as a very personal and deep blow to all of those involved in the restoration of the Mackintosh building over the last four years.
High praise is due to the firefighters who once again found themselves called to action at the School of Art, and who were still battling to prevent further fire from breaking out even as these pages were printing.
Questions about how a second fire, and one was so severe, was possible after so much care had been taken to restore the building must be answered in the coming weeks and months. While Glasgow is consumed with a sense of grief over this loss, there is palpable anger underneath the surface.
The fate of the O2 ABC venue also remains to be seen. The images printed in these pages suggest extensive damage to the building, which is a hub for live music and a favourite haunt for students and young people.
Despite this catastrophic event, the School as an institution will continue. Crises such as these often breed a strong resolve, and Glasgow is known for its tough spirit. It may be the end of a building, but it is not the end of the Glasgow School of Art.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here