LEGISLATION to ban upskirting is to be adopted as a Government Bill, Downing Street said.
The move comes after a Tory MP who blocked the progress of a backbench Bill to ban the practice of surreptitiously taking photos of underwear had his parliamentary office adorned with knickers.
Four pairs of knickers, bound together with a pink ribbon, were draped across the doorway to Sir Christopher Chope's office in the Norman Shaw North building on the parliamentary estate.
Sir Christopher stopped the Voyeurism (Offences) Bill from completing its second reading in the Commons on Friday by calling out "Object!"
READ MORE: Victim of upskirt photography campaigns to change sexual harassment laws
The move caused outrage and Commons Leader Andrea Leadsom told the regular weekly meeting of Cabinet that the upskirting legislation will now be adopted as a Government Bill to improve its chances of becoming law.
Mrs Leadsom said it was intended to secure a second reading in the Commons for the Bill in Government time as soon as possible and certainly before the summer recess, which begins on July 28.
Theresa May told Cabinet that upskirting was "an invasion of privacy which leaves victims feeling degraded and distressed", her spokesman told reporters.
The spokesman said there was no mention at the 90-minute meeting of Sir Christopher's intervention or of calls for reform of the procedures for private members' bills.
It is not believed that the Prime Minister has spoken with Sir Christopher since Friday.
Green MP Caroline Lucas, who has an office near Sir Christopher, took a photo of the knickers and said: "Good to see some redecorating happening in my corridor over the weekend."
READ MORE: Tory grandee Sir Christopher Chope condemned for blocking 'upskirting' Bill
It followed a similar protest outside Sir Christopher's constituency office at the weekend.
A former deputy speaker of the House of Commons has called for a change to the "arcane" procedures which allowed Sir Christopher to block legislation with a single word.
Nigel Evans has written to the Commons Procedure Committee to demand a review of Parliament's rules.
"When I was deputy speaker I saw this arcane procedure where people would shout 'Object!' as the title of the Bill was called out time and time again," he told BBC Radio 4's Westminster Hour.
"And I was so angry by the fact that not just the upskirting Bill but a number of other Bills on Friday, which are decent Bills that deserved some form of airtime, were blocked in this way that I've written to the chairman of the Procedure Committee and I've asked him as a matter of urgency to review and reform that arcane procedure."
Christchurch MP Sir Christopher, who has faced a storm of criticism, insisted that he supported the Bill's purpose of outlawing the practice of taking photographs up someone's clothing without consent, but was acting on a long-held principle that has seen him routinely oppose backbench private members' bills.
READ MORE: Laws bannning 'upskirting' failed to protect teachers, union says
Sir Christopher complained on Sunday that he was being "scapegoated" over the issue.
The 71-year-old told the Bournemouth Daily Echo: "The suggestion that I am some kind of pervert is a complete travesty of the truth.
"It's defamatory of my character and it's very depressing some of my colleagues have been perpetuating that in the past 48 hours."
He urged the Government to find the "fastest, fairest and surest passage" for a Bill banning the practice.
But fellow Dorset Tory MP Simon Hoare suggested Sir Christopher should apologise.
"Sorry really is the hardest word. Put the shovel down, apologise and learn," he said.
Without a specific law, victims in England and Wales must seek prosecution of upskirting through other legal avenues, such as outraging public decency or harassment.
Legislation in Scotland provides for a maximum two-year jail sentence.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel