GAVIN Williamson has been slapped down by Downing Street for apparently suggesting IRA terrorists should be given an amnesty from prosecution to provide the same protection to British soldiers.
The Defence Secretary wrote to Theresa May, urging her to create a "statute of limitations" for offences during the Troubles in Northern Ireland in the wake of new plans to examine criminal cases.
He told the Prime Minister British soldiers, who served in the region from the 1970s to the 1990s, should have the "protection they deserve", adding: "If this means a wider amnesty, so be it."
However, when questioned about Mr Williamson’s remarks, Mrs May’s deputy spokeswoman said: "We cannot countenance a proposal where amnesties would be provided to terrorists.
"We owe a debt of gratitude to the bravery of the soldiers and police officers who upheld the rule of law and are accountable to it."
In May, Karen Bradley, the Northern Ireland Secretary, sparked a political row by unveiling a consultation on the toxic legacy of the Troubles, which did not include an amnesty for members of the security forces.
She insisted there was "no support" in the region for a "Northern Ireland-only statute of limitations," as she launched a public consultation on other proposals to address unresolved issues from the past.
But in the leaked letter, Mr Williamson argued the contrary, saying that such a statute was exactly what was needed.
"If this means a wider amnesty, so be it: in the public mind, the effect of the Good Friday Agreement sentencing reforms, the 'On the Run' letters which inadvertently led to the failure of the prosecution of John Downey for the 1982 Hyde Park bombings, and the apparent disproportionate focus of the current investigation on security forces amount to a de facto amnesty for terrorists already.
"It is time to give our veterans the protection they deserve," declared the Secretary of State.
Earlier today, Mr Williamson reacted to the fallout to his leaked letter, tweeting: "Bit amazed to see the way this is described.
"The reality is that I'm prepared to go to any lengths to stop this ridiculous vendetta against former service personnel. Hopefully that is exactly what other colleagues are also pushing for."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel