THE company at the centre of the Edinburgh trams inquiry has lost an appeal to have documents it provided to the probe kept secret.
Bilfinger UK had instructed lawyers to return back to the Court of Session in Edinburgh seeking a ruling from appeal judges over a decision made by their colleague Lord Tyre earlier this year.
The firm wanted judges Lord Carloway, Lord Menzies and Lord Malcolm to block moves to publish paperwork, saying the information contained was “commercially sensitive” and could help competitors.
Lord Tyre refused to allow the company permission to stop the inquiry publishing the documents, which includes monthly reports made during the tram project to the firm’s German HQ.
Lawyers acting for the company argued Lord Tyre had incorrectly nterpreted the law.
But in a judgment published yesterday, the appeal judges ruled Lord Tyre had acted correctly.
In a ruling written by Lord Carloway, Scotland’s most senior judge, the appeal judges concluded the documents didn’t contain sensitive information that could damage the business’s interests.
Lord Carloway wrote: “The Lord Ordinary had some sympathy for the view that the respondent’s reference to the information being available to individuals who were no longer employed by the petitioner’s group, was an irrelevant consideration given that such employees would be the subject of contractual restraints.
“He held, however, it was not a material one. Whilst the court agrees with that reasoning, in fact the respondent was correct in its view, that the information would be available to those no longer employed by the petitioner’s group.
“It is not an unreasonable assumption that there will be many former group employees who will have been involved in many projects involving similar information and reports, who have moved on to work for other concerns.
“Whatever the contractual restraints, historical information on the petitioner’s working estimates and margins of the type under consideration would likely to be held by many working elsewhere in the civil engineering field.”
The Edinburgh trams project, which caused massive disruption to the capital, was delivered years late and more than £400 million over budget.
The inquiry into what went wrong has run for three years and cost £7 million.
Bilfinger handed over the documents to the inquiry. But it didn’t want the documents to be made public.
The inquiry’s chairman Lord Hardie decided to publish the material because he thought it was in the public interest for it to be made available.
He ruled that Bilfinger hadn’t shown exactly why the information contained within the documents was commercially sensitive.
This prompted Bilfinger to go to the Court of Session. Lord Tyre concluded that the inquiry acted correctly.
The firm then appealed to the Inner House of the Court of Session. But their bid there has also been rejected.
In the judgement published on Thursday, Lord Carloway wrote: “The court will refuse the reclaiming motion and adhere to the interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary dated May 8 2018.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel