He may have risen to the highest office in the land but John Major soon found out that his officials were not afraid to pick him up on the finer points of his speaking style, according to newly released official papers.
Files released by the National Archives include a handwritten note from his principal private secretary Andrew Turnbull dated January 25 1991, upbraiding the new prime minister for his use of "cliches" and "redundant" phrases in his speeches.
After acknowledging that he was "at risk of having a cushion thrown at me" for his pains, Mr (now Lord) Turnbull begins gently enough saying Mr Major's words were for the most part "admirably clear".
"The grammar is excellent, sentences having subject, verb, object etc. Your transcripts read as almost perfect prose. Most other people have a speaking style which comes out horribly in print," he wrote.
But he then picks up on an observation by the former Conservative MP and commentator Matthew Parris who noted his tendency "to add words and phrases which are redundant, or worse cliches".
He wrote: "To illustrate this I have compared the text of your first Gulf speech with the version as delivered. I was struck by the following:
"1. Use of 'self-evident'. This is very common. But if something is self-evident it can simply be stated.
"2. Use of 'clear' with another adverb which simply expresses degrees of clearness eg. 'crystal' clear, 'entirely', 'absolutely'.
"3. Duplicating adjectives 'complete and full', 'crudely and brutally', 'doubt and hesitant'."
He then ends: "I hope you do not object to my making these observations."
Mr Major, who had only been in office for two months, responds, perhaps surprisingly mildly, saying: "Many thanks - I don't have a cushion to hand! You are right - I am too verbose sometimes, with unnecessary addition.
"I'll try desist. But Matthew I thought, was an old friend and went over the top. But, I'll watch it - and thanks."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel