Britain may have to rethink the decision to leave the European Union if the Government is unable to strike a Brexit deal with Brussels, a former head of the Civil Service has warned.
Lord Kerslake said the consequences of a “no-deal” break would be so serious, Parliament would have consider whether it could allow it to go ahead.
The peer, who has advised Labour on preparing for government, said that at the least there would have to be a “pause” in the Article 50 process under which the UK is set to leave the bloc on March 29 next year.
In those circumstances, he said, the European Commission would almost certainly insist on some “re-examination” of the original 2016 referendum decision to leave.
His comments came as the Government prepares to publish a series of technical notes on preparations for a no-deal Brexit across dozens of areas of British life, from farming to financial services.
Lord Kerslake said the measures were “too little, too late” and that the Government had not allowed itself enough time to prepare for such an outcome.
He told the the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: “The consequences of a no deal would be so serious as I think Parliament would have to seriously consider whether it could contemplate this.
“The question people need ask themselves is: is this a risk that they think we should be taking?
“If the Government can negotiate a good deal, then so be it. But if they can’t and we end up in this position, then we have to reopen the question of whether we go forward with Brexit at all. It is not too late to do that.
“A pause to reflect would certainly be necessary. I think that is a pretty high probability now.
“But I think that pause would need to include – and I suspect this would be insisted on by the (European) Commission – some re-examination of the decision itself.”
The co-chairman of the pro-Brexit Leave Means Leave campaign group, Richard Tice, said Lord Kerslake’s intervention was intended to “soften people up” for a delay to Britain’s withdrawal.
“That would be absolutely appalling. People up and down the country would be furious that our civil servants and Government have deliberately ignored the will of he people,” he told the Today programme.
“What we have just heard from Lord Kerslake is part of the deliberate negativity from the Civil Service who are looking to soften people up in order to extend Article 50. It is completely unacceptable.”
Earlier it was announced that Nigel Farage was to become vice chairman of Leave Means Leave to spearhead the campaign against Theresa May’s Chequers plan for Brexit, which critics regard as a sell-out.
Writing in the Daily Telegraph, the former Ukip leader said: “It is now beyond doubt that the political class in Westminster and many of their media allies do not accept the EU referendum result.
“It is equally clear to me that, unless challenged, these anti-democrats will succeed in frustrating the result.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel