Tesla chief Elon Musk and the electric car company have agreed to pay a total of 40 million dollars (£30 million) and make a series of concessions to settle a government lawsuit alleging he duped investors with misleading statements about a proposed buyout of the company.
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the settlement on Saturday, two days after filing a case seeking to oust Mr Musk as chief executive.
The settlement will require him to relinquish his role as chairman for at least three years, but he will able to remain as chief executive.
Elon Musk settles SEC fraud charges; Tesla charged with and resolves securities law charge https://t.co/QVa37B6woo
— SEC_News (@SEC_News) September 29, 2018
Tesla must hire an independent chairman to oversee the company.
Mr Musk, a billionaire, and Tesla, a company that ended June with 2.2 billion dollars (£1.7 billion) in cash, are each paying 20 million dollars (£15 million) to resolve the case.
The deal could remove one cloud that hangs over Tesla. Investors fretted about the company’s ability to cope without Mr Musk, a charismatic entrepreneur whose penchant for coming up with revolutionary ideas has drawn comparisons to one of Silicon Valley’s most revered visionaries, Apple co-founder Steve Jobs.
Tesla’s stock plummeted 14% on Friday after the SEC filed its lawsuit, erasing more than 7 billion dollars in shareholder wealth. Many analysts predicted the shares would fall further if Mr Musk was forced to step down.
The steep downturn in Tesla’s market value may have influenced him to have an apparent change of heart and negotiate a settlement. He had rejected a similar settlement offer before the SEC sued on Thursday, maintaining he had done nothing wrong when he posted an August 7 tweet declaring he had secured the financing to lead a buyout of Tesla.
The SEC alleged Mr Musk was not close to locking up the estimated 25 billion to 50 billion dollars (£19 billion to £38 billion) needed to pull off the buyout.
Mr Musk and Tesla reached their settlement without admitting to or denying the SEC’s allegations.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here