AN investigation into the independent review on mesh implants has uncovered a series of systematic failures in the way it was conducted.
Professor Alison Britton said the review was "ill-conceived, thoughtlessly structured and poorly executed", but stressed that she found no evidence that anyone involved had acted "in bad faith".
It has led to calls for the original report to be thrown out and a new inquiry launched.
Read more: Scottish Tory leader Ruth Davidson gives birth to baby boy
Prof Britton was tasked by the Scottish Government with examining how the Scottish Independent Review of Transvaginal Mesh Implants was carried out following widespread criticism of its final report.
Her year-long investigative review has made a series of recommendations which may be applied to similar independent reviews in the future.
The Scottish Government said it would consider her findings.
The original mesh review was commissioned by ministers after a number women gave evidence at Holyrood describing how the medical devices had ruined their lives.
Many experienced serious complications including excruciating abdominal pain following procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.
Read more: Troy MSP under fire after saying rape clause is fair 'as it means poor have fewer kids'
The review group was set up in 2014, but its final report was not published until March 2017.
Prior to publication, the first chair of the group and three members resigned.
There were claims the report was a "whitewash", with key parts warning of the risks of mesh implants removed.
Prof Britton's report states: "Having reviewed the evidence, we have concluded that the mesh review and the process leading up to the publication of its final report were characterised by systematic failures.
"We found that the Mesh Review was ill-conceived, thoughtlessly structured and poorly executed.
"Negative factors including irreconcilable differences of opinion of review members, lack of agreement on the interpretation of evidence, unhelpful political and media influences and pressure to complete the report only served to magnify the failures in the process."
Read more: Health Secretary calls a halt to use of mesh implants
Professor Britton said it was a "major failing" that potential conflicts of interest were not declared or even discussed.
She found some members had been paid by the pharmaceutical industry, some were suing and some were being sued.
The report states: "The independence of any investigation is the spine which gives it credibility and legitimacy. Our investigation identified a number of problems with how the mesh review solicited, monitored and reported relevant declarations and conflicts of interests by members of the review group.
"We record a number of criticisms on how the Mesh Review was conducted. Some of these criticisms have informed our recommendations.
"However, we were satisfied that no one involved in the Mesh Review was acting in bad faith."
Her 46 recommendations include setting up a dedicated unit to support commissioned reviews, and the application of a test of impartiality to allow a review group member's prior knowledge or involvement in a subject to be disclosed and evaluated.
Scottish Labour MSP Neil Findlay said: "This report that reveals the SNP's original mesh review was a complete white wash.
"It is now time for the SNP government to completely ditch this discredited review and immediately pledge to deliver a thorough and truly independent inquiry.
"Anything less would be an insult to the women who have suffered so much as a result of mesh. A hundred MSPs signed pledge to oppose a mesh whitewash I hope that they will all support this call."
Scottish Conservative interim leader Jackson Carlaw said there were "very serious lessons to be learned" for the Scottish Government.
He said:“It’s well-established that mesh implants are a national, self-inflicted scandal which has impacted on thousands of women.
“It’s why I brought it centre stage in my first FMQs.
“Now we learn from Professor Alison Britton that the SNP government’s review into this scandal was utterly compromised by the inclusion of those with clear vested interests which they were never asked to declare.
“On Thursday, I secured from the First Minister a full, formal and unequivocal apology to all the women affected by mesh for the crippling pain and anxiety they’ve experienced from life-changing injuries.
“Ministers must now also apologise for this inadequate review and explain why anyone can now have confidence in the conclusions it reached."
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "We received Professor Britton's Investigative Review into the Process of Establishing, Managing and Supporting Independent Reviews on Thursday.
"The Scottish Government [published] this report on Friday and will give full consideration to the findings in due course."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel