BRITAIN might not have time to negotiate a new deal with Brussels if MPs decide to amend any Brexit agreement, a senior minister has suggested.
Andrea Leadsom, the Commons Leader, said the UK Government would "take action" on any amendments to the Brexit deal motion approved by MPs but added that it might not be possible for ministers to "proceed on the basis of an amended vote".
Her remarks came after Ken Clarke, the former Conservative Chancellor, warned UK ministers against offering MPs the choice of deal or no-deal.
Pete Wishart for the SNP also claimed that Theresa May could, in Game Of Thrones-style, be "consumed by the flames" of Brexit as he pushed for assurances over the "meaningful vote".
Mrs Leadsom also announced the Commons business following next week's short November recess, with no further Brexit legislation listed but with time scheduled for a debate on the 70th birthday of the Prince of Wales.
Speaking at Business of the House Questions, Mr Clarke said Mrs Leadsom had confirmed a "meaningful vote" in response to questions from Mr Wishart.
He added: "She confirmed we're going to have meaningful votes because there are going to be amendments to that motion.
"She was of course right to say the Government can't ratify a draft agreement if the House rejects it but will she accept that the meaningful votes on the amendments mean that if an amendment is passed, the Government will feel it should go back to Brussels and try to negotiate a deal as amended by the majority of this House?
"I hope she's not reverting to the arguments that it's the deal we've got or no deal at all, which the Government was defeated on when we were actually debating the Withdrawal Bill earlier this year."
Mrs Leadsom replied: "The facts of the case are that the Government will be bringing forward a vote on the deal that the Government has negotiated.
"It will be an amendable motion of the House, and, should the House amend that motion, then the Government would take action on those amendments.
"However, I must point out to the House again that, having negotiated a particular deal with the European Union, it may not be possible for the Government to proceed on the basis of an amended vote.
"While this House will be asked to decide whether it agrees for the Government to negotiate on the basis of the agreed deal or not will be a matter for this House."
Earlier, Mr Wishart compared the Prime Minister's Brexit strife to Game Of Thrones as he demanded further clarification on the current state of negotiations with the EU.
"The chill is in the air and, like winter, Brexit is coming,” declared the Perth MP.
"The undead white walkers of the ERG have breached the wall and Westminstros is under siege and, while the Prime Minister is no mother of dragons, she does have fire breathers to contend with; she might just be about to be consumed by the flames.
"In the battle with the 27 kingdoms apparently we're told to expect a deal on November 21 for a Brexit agreement only for Dexu to issue a statement downplaying the significance of this date.
"Can the Leader of the House explain what exactly is going on, when will we have this meaningful vote, on what conditions and what basis will it be put to the House and what range of options will we have to consider and can she assure us that this meaningful vote won't be a meaningless vote?"
Mrs Leadsom responded with her own quip, saying: "Well, he mentions various excerpts from the Game Of Thrones and all I would say to him is: 'You know nothing, Jon Snow' and I'm afraid that is often the case in this place."
She added: "It is absolutely the case that this House will be invited to give its views and to lend its support to the deal that the United Kingdom will be seeking to agree with the European Union; it will be vital that we have that approval in order to proceed.
"Such a motion will be a motion of the House, it will be amendable, but to be very clear, as I said last week and the week before, it will be important that the Government has the permission of the House to go ahead with a deal that has been agreed. If it doesn't have that permission, then it will not be able to proceed with that deal."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel