The Conservatives have accused the SNP of “putting nationalism before farming” by snubbing an offer to extend powers in the UK Government’s post-Brexit agriculture plan.
The UK Government offered to extend powers in the Agriculture Bill to enable devolved administrations to develop their own subsidy systems when the UK is removed from EU agricultural support following Brexit.
Wales and Northern Ireland took up the offer but the Scottish Government did not.
The Scottish Conservatives claim the decision put nationalist interests ahead of concern for the future of farming but the SNP said the Tories were attempting to grab powers and cash from Scotland.
Scottish Conservative rural economy spokesman Donald Cameron said: “The SNP are simply creating further uncertainty and confusion for Scotland’s farmers and crofters.
“This decision not to follow other devolved administrations is simply a case of putting nationalism before the interests of agriculture.
“The short-sighted refusal of the SNP to include Scotland in the UK Agriculture Bill will mean that Scotland’s farmers are left behind in comparison to those in Wales, Northern Ireland and England.”
He claimed the Scottish Government has put forward no “substantive policy” for future farming support.
A spokesman for Rural Economy Secretary Fergus Ewing said: “We will take no lectures from the Tories – they are the ones proposing to take direct payments away from Scotland’s farmers and crofters.
“The reality is the SNP Government has the most detailed proposals to provide stability and certainty for farmers post-Brexit of any government in the UK, but the Tories are engaged not just in a power grab but also a cash grab.
“The power grab could see them open the way for the likes of hormone-injected beef and chlorinated chicken, to secure a Trump trade deal, while the cash grab threatens seeing our farmers and crofters short-changed.
“The idea that Holyrood should give consent to such measures drives a coach and horses through the principles of devolution – and we won’t stand for it.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel