Foodbanks should be backed with government cash and brought under the auspices of the social security system, according to one of their pioneers in Scotland.
Mark Frankland, of Dumfries-based First Base, which gives out 4000 food parcels a year across Dumfries and Galloway, said: “There seems to be a complete determination never to treat foodbanks as part of the welfare state. But 90 per cent of our referrals come from people working for the state – from Job Centres, social workers, homeless teams.
“People say ‘we want to get rid of foodbanks’. But if they hadn’t been around, you might well have seen people starve.”
Mr Frankland, who recently gave evidence at Holyrood’s Social Security Committee, said with food and child poverty expected to spike over the next five years, the government should consider funding foodbanks. “That would let us put more items in a food parcels, such as fresh fruit and veg or vouchers for people who run out of power.
“If what is on offer from the DWP isn’t enough to keep body and soul together, we are there to be considered,” he said. “I don’t think the system would be abused. People generally hate walking through our doors unless they absolutely have to. “
He added “We treat people very differently from a bureaucrat. Why is it so bad for someone to go and get a bag of food, donated by people who give a damn, rather than turning up at an office to get £10 from a grudging bureaucrat?”
However poverty campaigners reject the suggestion that emergency food parcels should become one of the elements of on offer from the welfare state. Peter Kelly, director of the Poverty Alliance, said: “We support foodbanks, I give to them myself all the time. But no matter how much foodbanks are needed they are not a sufficient response. If our response to poverty becomes less based on security and people’s rights and more to do with charitable giving and donations, that is likely to be stigmatising.”
He said he had ‘maximum’ respect for all those running foodbanks and volunteering at them, but said: ”It is part of the response, but needs to be time limited. It is a temporary response to crisis, not a mainstream response to a systemic problem.”
Polly Jones, project manager of Menu for Change, which argues for alternatives to emergency food aid, said: “People running foodbanks do it out of the best intentions. They are trying to step up and help. But the idea that it should be pulled in as part of our universal social security system is the wrong approach.
“We need to make social security systems work better and fix the holes in the safety net first.
“If foodbanks worked, people wouldn’t go back again, but in fact the vast majority using foodbanks do return, at least once.”
Mr Frankland also claimed people on low incomes were being hard-hit by price rises from major supermarkets, which he accused of quietly raising the price of some of their cheapest items.
The shopping bill for First Base, which tops up donated food to ensure parcels are nutritionally balanced, has doubled in a year, he said, from £1000 a month to £2000 a month.
While the charity has seen a ten percent increase in demand, the bulk of the cost has come from price rises on supermarkets’ value ranges, he said.
“IT seems to be standard policy to limit availability and raise prices in their value ranges. Tesco has got rid of many of its ‘value’ products and replaced them with other brands, while value range longer life milk has disappeared from the shelves. It used to cost us 49 pence a litre, now the next cheapest option is 79 pence.
“We are seeing unbelievable price rises on food at the lowest end of the market. It feels as if they are targeting the very poorest customers so they can keep their main range prices the same. “
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel