A record number of women have been elected to the US house of representatives.
Voters are on track to send at least 99 women to the house, surpassing the previous record of 84.
According to data compiled by The Associated Press, 237 women ran for the house as major-party candidates this year.
Read more: Democrats take House but Trump's grip on Senate tightens
Among the new representatives headed to the house is Jennifer Wexton, a Virginia state senator who defeated incumbent Barbara Comstock in one of the most closely-watched races across the country.
And Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the former Bernie Sanders organiser who won a shock primary victory over a senior house Democrat, will also head to congress.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (Photo: Getty)
The election day gains by women capped a midterm election which has been defined by the energy of women, both on the political left and right.
Female candidates not only ran for office at an unprecedented rate, with several defeating white, male incumbents during their party primaries, they mobilised on the grassroots level, and played larger roles as donors than in previous election cycles.
In victory speeches across the country, women acknowledged it has been a ground-breaking year.
Ayanna Pressley, who became the first black woman elected to US congress from Massachusetts, said: "I am so honoured to share both the ballot and the stage with the many visionary, bold women who have raised their hand to run for public office.
"Now, listen, I know for a fact none of us ran to make history - we ran to make change. However, the historical significance of this evening is not lost on me. The significance of history is not lost on me, including my personal one."
Hillary Clinton rallying for Donna Shalala on campaign trail (Photo: Getty)
Former health and human services secretary Donna Shalala acknowledged that both of her opponents in the race for a house seat from Florida were women.
She said: "This is the year of the woman, and the fact that women were willing to put themselves on the line is important, whether they've been Republicans or Democrats."
This year, women not only increased their numbers in congress, but the new class of representatives includes women from a wide patchwork of backgrounds, adding to a legislature that is expected to be more diverse.
"This isn't just the year of the woman, this is the year of every woman," said Cecile Richards, who served as the president of Planned Parenthood for more than a decade, noting the ground-breaking diversity among the women who have run for office this year.
Women were the heroes of this election - not only as candidates, but as activists, donors, supporters, and volunteers powering a wave of grassroots activism. They have forever changed our politics and our country. https://t.co/6FCw4S1viX
— Cecile Richards (@CecileRichards) November 7, 2018
Texas is set to send its first Hispanic women to congress, as Democrats Veronica Escobar and Sylvia Garcia both won their races.
In Kansas, Sharice Davids, a Democrat running in a suburban Kansas City district, will become one of the first Native American women elected to congress, and the first openly LGBT person to represent Kansas at the federal level.
Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren, one of the Democrats who is considering a shot at the 2020 presidential race, said that the two years since Mr Trump ascended to the White House had ushered a new generation of women into public life.
"Women who had never run for anything stepped up to put their names on the ballot," she said.
"They ignored the party bosses who said they should wait their turn. They ignored the consultants who said they should cover up their tattoos and smile more, and they ignored the powerful men of the Republican Party who never took them seriously anyway.
"They refused to let anyone shut them up or stand in their way, and that is how real change begins."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel