AS Finance Secretary Derek Mackay took centre stage to unveil his draft Scottish Budget on Wednesday there was a small walk on part for his predecessor in the role John Swinney.
Affronted by a hubbub of interruptions from Labour MSPs, led by the party’s finance spokesman John Kelly, Mr Swinney heckled loudly back, prompting a rebuke from the presiding officer.
“Can I just ask members please to keep quiet for a second and let’s hear the questions without bellowing out,” ordered Ken Macintosh.
“I am particularly referring to Mr Swinney and Mr Kelly. Do not bellow at each other across the chamber.”
Given initial reactions to the spending plans for education in the Budget, Mr Swinney is likely to be involved in more heated exchanges in the coming weeks.
The stakes are high. The Scottish Government has made the improvement of education its defining mission and in his statement to the Scottish Parliament Mr Mackay reiterated that objective.
“This government has made clear that our priority is closing the attainment gap and improving education,” he said.
“We are determined to improve the life chances of children in Scotland and change the lives of our future generations for the better.”
This, he argued would be assisted by a “real terms increase” in investment in the education portfolio for 2019/20 with £500 million to expand nursery education and over £180m for schools to improve performance and close the attainment gap - including £120m for the Pupil Equity Fund (PEF) which channels money directly to schools in disadvantaged areas.
This “all is well” approach was met with immediate scepticism from Mr Kelly who said council services were at “breaking point” with headteachers already writing to parents warning them of unprecedented cuts.
The response from council umbrella body Cosla yesterday was equally downbeat with officials arguing the settlement amounted to a real terms cut once extra money for delivering new policies such as the roll-out of free nursery care were stripped out.
Stephen McCabe, the organisation’s education spokesman, said: “They say they are putting additional money in, but it seems to be a rebranding of money that is already in the system, such as investment for PEF and the early years.
“The simple reality is that when you strip out that money for new responsibilities local government revenue has been cut by £237m.
“That cannot but impact on education given that it is such a large part of every council’s budget. We were anticipating a poor settlement, but this is a very poor settlement.”
The other pressing concern for schools is the increasing likelihood of a teacher strike next year as unions move towards a ballot following the rejection of their demands for a ten per cent pay hike.
Mr Mackay confirmed his public sector pay policy would provide no more than a three per cent rise for those earning £36,500 or less insisting it was “reasonable and acceptable”.
Larry Flanagan, general secretary of the Educational Institute of Scotland, strongly disagrees and sees nothing in the draft Budget that will delay the prospect of industrial action.
“We are disappointed on the pay front and it reflects a degree of complacency on the government's part to the mood of public sector workers. It will fan the flames of discontent amongst teachers,” he said.
For headteachers the extra kick in the teeth is the Scottish Government’s refusal to adopt the Westminster Government’s increase in the higher rate of tax threshold which will squeeze salaries even further at a time when it is proving hard to recruit new school leaders.
And Mr Swinney has a new headache. Last year, universities were relatively happy with the Budget because they believed ministers had finally acknowledged that further cuts in public funding was leaving them in a precarious position.
Mr Mackay’s brief reference in his statement to “over £1 billion for universities” neatly skirted over the fact this amounts to a real terms cut of 1.79 per cent.
Universities are already having to rely on fees income from overseas student to subsidise the cost of teaching Scottish students and research funding is also under pressure.
Professor Andrea Nolan, convener of Universities Scotland, said institutions would find it “difficult” to deal with cuts which threatened the future viability of the country’s world renowned higher education sector.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel