Labour’s general secretary has rejected a call by deputy leader Tom Watson to suspend a constituency party for “bullying” its MP.
Mr Watson wrote to Labour’s general secretary Jennie Formby calling for her to suspend Luciana Berger’s constituency Labour party (CLP) after she faced potential no confidence motions.
The motions against Ms Berger, who has been a prominent critic of Jeremy Corbyn over his handling of anti-Semitism and his position on Brexit, were withdrawn, but Mr Watson pressed for action against the activists in her Liverpool Wavertree seat.
Ms Formby said she was pleased the motions had been withdrawn and Labour should stand in solidarity with Ms Berger as “she continues to experience appalling abuse”.
Mr Watson said the CLP’s behaviour was “intolerable” and added Ms Berger was clearly being bullied.
But Ms Formby said there was “no constitutional basis” to take action against the CLP.
Ms Formby said: “I’m pleased that the motions to Wavertree CLP regarding Luciana Berger were withdrawn.
“At a time when she continues to experience appalling abuse it is right to stand in solidarity with her.
“For all those asking, there was no constitutional basis on which to suspend the CLP.”
Labour Party chairman Ian Lavery said in a HuffPost UK blog: “I have no problem, as a Labour MP, with being held to account by the members who do the work to elect me. That is party democracy.
“But there has to be tolerance and respect. No-one, including MPs, should be bullied, least of all women members of parliament, some of whom, like Diane Abbott and Luciana Berger, have been subject to horrible abuse.”
But he added: “It is unacceptable for either MPs or whole constituency parties to be subject to trial by social media, as happens too often in the current climate.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel