A TERMINALLY ill pensioner who drove without a licence for 45 years before police caught her using a fake has been condemned by a sheriff yesterday as she was hit with a fine for her antics.
Mary Burke, who is suffering from lung cancer and only has between six months and two years to live, drove for nearly five decades – despite having never sat or passed a driving test.
The 71-year-old’s fake pink paper licence was so good that the authorities were even fooled in to believing it was real when she was given penalty points for speeding in 2002.
But she has now given up driving for good and got rid of her car after her lengthy scheme spectacularly unravelled – landing the first offender in court and leaving her with a criminal record.
She previously pleaded guilty to driving her Mercedes without a licence and using a fake licence and returned to the dock at Dumbarton Sheriff Court yesterday to be sentenced.
As he banned her from driving for a year and fined her £750, reduced from £1,000 as she admitted her guilt, Sheriff William Gallacher said: “You were utterly wilful in relation to your decision to be driving.”
He said driving tests showed that people had “the experience, quality and ability to drive” but that she ignored it, adding: “You said, ‘that doesn’t apply to me, I’ll just drive anyway’. This is a very serious matter.”
Defence solicitor Virgil Crawford said Burke, who lives in a static caravan, has terminal lung cancer, explaining: “She has between six months and two years in respect of that. She accepts she has driven for some time - even before her kids were born and when her kids were young.”
After hearing that she receives £150-per-week from her pension, never planned to drive again and had let a family member get rid of her car, Sheriff Gallacher imposed the fine, allowing her to pay at a rate of £15 per week.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel