CRAIG Whyte's Rangers takeover was clinched with a £1 coin being tossed across a table in Sir David Murray's office, a court heard.
Philip Betts – a key associate in Whyte's buyout – recalled being at the May 2011 meeting as the businessman acquired Sir David's majority stake in the club.
Mr Betts told how he also took photos at the gathering he described as being “light hearted”.
The claims were yesterday made at Whyte's trial at the High Court in Glasgow.
The 46-year-old denies a charge of fraud and a second allegation under the Companies Act in connection with his takeover.
Mr Betts, 54, an asset finance broker told how he got involved in Whyte's bid for Rangers after first meeting him in 2009.
The 54-year-old recalled Whyte had wanted his interest to be “low profile”.
He told the trial Whyte had wanted to raise £10m.
But, Mr Betts said Whyte later claimed he was “struggling” to do so and “could not understand why”.
There was a later meeting with Mr Betts, Whyte and Ticketus, who “expressed an interest” in Whyte's proposal.
Prosecutors state Whyte took out a loan from the firm against three years season tickets to help fund the takeover.
Mr Betts said Whyte had been “pleased” at the Ticketus interest.
But, the witness added: “He then asked me to ask them would they consider £20m.
“I think I laughed. I said I would ask as long as he was happy to receive a no.”
However, Mr Betts recalled “after some deliberation” Ticketus came back and said they would be “interested”.
Mr Betts told how he travelled to Edinburgh in May 2011 for the buyout to be completed.
Prosecutor Alex Prentice QC asked once the signing occurred was a £1 coin provided?
Mr Betts replied: “There was, but I do not know from who. It was flicked across the table to the lawyers of the Murray Group.
“It was all light hearted.”
The advocate depute went on: “Was anything said?”
Mr Betts: “Congratulations, you are now owner of Glasgow Rangers Football Club, I think.”
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel