A man who threw acid in the face of a journalist on the doorstep of his home has been jailed for 10 years.
William Burns posed as a postman before throwing sulphuric acid at Russell Findlay at his home in Glasgow in December 2015.
Sentencing Burns at the High Court in Aberdeen on Tuesday, Judge Lord Matthews said the 56-year-old had apparently carried out the "vicious, premeditated attack" due to objecting "to something that your victim wrote".
Crime writer Mr Findlay overpowered Burns with the help of neighbours.
Burns, from Paisley, Renfrewshire, denied the attack but was found guilty of assault to severe injury and danger of life following a trial at the High Court in Glasgow.
He was sentenced to 10 years in jail with five years on licence following release.
Mr Matthews told him he was "clearly a dangerous man".
He said: "You have been convicted of a vicious, premeditated attack by the throwing of sulphuric acid into the face of a journalist on the threshold of his own home two days before Christmas.
"You were caught virtually red-handed and your own evidence was an obvious fabrication from start to finish, plainly being made up as you were going along.
"Leaving aside your own explanation why you were there, the only reason I can discern for your actions is that you objected to something that your victim wrote.
"There are ways and means of dealing with grievances, real or imagined, against the media and this was plainly not one of them.
"The freedom of the press is an essential tool in the armoury of any democracy and attacks of this nature will not be tolerated."
His sentencing statement, later released by the Judiciary of Scotland, continued: "To some extent, you bit off more than you could chew. Mr Findlay did not take your attack lying down.
"He was able to overpower you and with the prompt assistance of neighbours you were detained there and then.
"Due to the intervention of those neighbours, Mr Findlay's injuries were not as bad as they might have been.
"It is or should be well-known that acid has the potential to cause catastrophic damage and it is no thanks to you that that was not the case here."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here