A trusted boss who defrauded an animal charity and blew £640,000 on an online gambling website has been jailed for five years.
Simon Price, 53, and his wife Alayna, 39, admitted cheating Birmingham Dogs Home in an £894,754 fraud over four years, from 2012.
Price, who admitted 10 offences, and his spouse, who pleaded guilty to five offences, funnelled cash into their personal accounts, leaving the well-established and trusted charity “weakened”, a judge told them.
Gambling addict Simon Price, in his role as the charity’s chief executive, diverted cash from legacies left to the dogs’ home, including the sale of a £399,000 house, to feed his escalating habit.
The money had been intended to keep animals “safe and warm”, but Birmingham Crown Court heard how Price spent thousands on gambling, trying to recover ever more cash on his losing bets.
He himself calculated to police that he had spent £700,000 through his account on the Betfair website from 2009.
Fearing his damaging deception was about to come to light, he flew alone to Barcelona, Spain, leaving his wife a note to say “Sorry, I need to go away for a while – I need time to think.”
However, he voluntarily returned to “face the music”, said Judge Patrick Thomas QC, who jailed him for five years on Friday.
The judge told him that his actions “while in the grip of a gambling addiction” had “weakened public confidence” in the work of the dogs’ home, damaging its ability to raise the £1.85 million needed each year to keep its doors open.
The court also heard none of the money he stole had been repaid and it was unlikely to be recovered.
Mother-of-one Alayna Price, who is seven months pregnant, was spared jail as the judge imposed a two-year suspended term on her after hearing about her personal circumstances.
The couple, of Somerton Drive, Marston Green, Solihull – who have since separated – sat in the dock, as the judge sentenced them, with Mrs Price bursting into tears when she heard she would not be going to prison.
As commercial manager of the charity, she funnelled five legacy payments, including one for £150,000, into her personal Lloyds account, blowing the cash paying off credit cards, a loan, and the couple’s wedding in 2016.
In all, she diverted £254,729, but the judge was told she made repayments – one almost immediately after taking the cash – meaning £123,000 was left outstanding.
In a statement read to court, charity chairman John Wheatley said the “serious breach of trust” had left the staff feeling “very badly let down”.
He added: “These crimes against an old, established charity have implications to damage, not only in the present but also the future.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article