UNIVERSITIES are facing mounting political pressure to meet tough targets on attracting more students from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Shirley-Anne Sommerville, the Higher Education Minister, said the “disparity” that exists between different institutions “must change”.
The Scottish Government has already appointed Sir Peter Scott as the country's first Commissioner for Fair Access.
However, Ms Somerville has now announced her intention to chair a new group that will co-ordinate and monitor progress across all parts of the education system.
The announcement came during an update on progress towards meeting a Scottish Government target for one fifth of all those starting university in 2030 to be from the poorest 20 per cent of communities.
The government has an interim target for individual universities to have ten per cent of students from the 20 per cent most deprived backgrounds by 2021.
However, although recent statistics show the overall proportion is 10.4 per cent, Scotland’s older universities have much lower proportions.
In a statement to the Scottish Parliament, Ms Sommerville said: “There is disparity between universities in terms of the backgrounds of young people who study with them. That must change.
“Every young person must have equal chances and choices to study at any of our Scottish institutions.”
The minister said she expected the Scottish Funding Council to identify where targets were not being met and set more challenging ones.
She added: “I expect it to do this in a transparent way. To set out clearly, and publicly, the access related activity and ambitions being set by institutions... and to report the progress being made.
“Over the next 12 months I therefore expect universities to make clear and demonstrable progress in this area that will ensure delivery of access thresholds in time for academic year 2019/20.”
Opposition politicians raised concerns the Scottish Government was no longer funding additional places for access arguing this would mean the “displacement” of students from other socio-economic backgrounds.
Liz Smith, education spokeswoman for the Scottish Conservatives, said: “Some fundamental questions remain for the Scottish Government including whether ministers will review higher education funding to provide additional resources to increase the number of university places and minimise the displacement effect on other well-qualified students.”
Iain Gray, Scottish Labour’s education spokesman, added: “It is a disgrace that your chance of getting to university still depends so much on family background and even more disgraceful that after ten years of SNP government this problem is significantly worse here than in England.
“The SNP has announced a blizzard of frameworks, working groups and outcome agreements, but it has failed to restore funding for widening access.”
A spokeswoman for Universities Scotland, which represents principals, said institutions accepted there were too many social and economic barriers which prevented people getting to higher education.
She said: “The recommendations set out are undoubtedly challenging, as was the message from government, but we have said as a university sector that we will not shy away from that challenge.
“We’re well into work to deliver new ways of doing things in admissions, on articulation from college and on bridging programmes between school and university.
“Universities will play a full part, but the biggest difference to widening access will come if we join up work in the early years all the way through, beyond school and college leavers, to give opportunities to people returning to university as mature learners as well.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel