A £2 billion wind farm project is to go ahead after a court appeal by wildlife campaigners was rejected.
The Neart na Gaoithe offshore wind farm was one of four projects given planning approval by Scottish ministers in 2014, but challenged in the courts by RSPB Scotland.
The charity won its initial legal bid after arguing the developments - also including the Inch Cape and Seagreen Alpha and Bravo projects - threatened thousands of seabirds.
However the ruling was overturned after ministers appealed.
The Inner House of the Court of Session has now refused the RSPB's application to appeal against that decision at the Supreme Court.
Andy Kinsella, of Mainstream Renewable Power, the developer behind the Neart na Gaoithe project off the Fife coast, said; "After more than two years and two court hearings, we hope that the RSPB acknowledges a fair hearing and allows us to get on with delivering the very significant benefits this project brings to the Scottish economy and its environment."
The firm said its project alone will be capable of supplying 325,000 homes with clean energy, while creating more than 500 jobs during construction and over 100 permanent posts once operational.
It said £540 million will be directly invested in Scotland during construction, with a further £610 million during the operational phase.
Mr Kinsella added: "We have taken advantage of significant advances in the technology to be used, allowing the number of turbines to be reduced from the 125 in the original consent application in 2012 to a maximum of 64."
Work is expected to start on the project in 2018.
RSPB has 28 days to decide whether to apply directly to the Supreme Court.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel