LIGHTNING may strike less often in future as the planet warms, a scientific study suggests.
Scientists from Edinburgh, Leeds and Lancaster universities used a new method to calculate the likely incidence of lightning flashes from storm clouds.
They found there is likely be a 15 per cent drop in the average number of lightning flashes worldwide by the turn of this century.
This could also impact on the frequency of wildfires, especially in tropical regions.
Fewer strikes to infrastructure could also affect how greenhouse gases in the atmosphere contribute to climate change.
Dr Declan Finney of the University of Leeds, formerly of the University of Edinburgh, said: "This research questions the reliability of previous projections of lightning and encourages further study into the effects of climate change on cloud ice and lightning."
Unlike traditional calculations of lightning flashes which are based on the height of clouds, their approach took into account the movement of tiny ice particles that form and move within clouds.
Electrical charges build up in these particles and in cold water droplets and soft hail formed inside clouds.
These are discharged during storms, giving rise to lightning flashes and thunder.
Scientists estimate there are 1.4 billion lightning flashes each year around the world.
Accounting for a 5C rise in global average temperatures by the year 2100, the latest results show that on average lightning flashes are less likely in future, in contrast to previous studies.
Scientists previously verified their method by applying it to current conditions.
The research, published in Nature Climate Change, was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council.
Professor Ruth Doherty, of the University of Edinburgh's School of Geosciences, said: "This research expands our current knowledge of climate change impacts on lightning and suggests that in a warmer world, the incidence of lightning is likely to decrease."
Professor Oliver Wild, Lancaster University, added: "The results provide new insight into the likely impacts of lightning on future atmospheric composition and climate."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here