The Ministry of Defence has emerged as one of the winners in the Spending Review with a real-terms budget increase of more than 3% over the course of the Parliament.
Spending is set to rise from £34.3 billion in 2015-16 to £38.1 billion in 2019-20, according to the Treasury Blue Book, to cover the costs of implementing the Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR) earlier this week.
It includes an investment of £2 billion in special forces and £1.2 billion to ensure the first of the Royal Navy's new aircraft carriers has a full complement of F-35 joint strike fighters from 2023.
It will also enable the MoD to replace the Nimrod maritime patrol aircraft which was scrapped in the last SDSR and to go ahead with the renewal of the submarine fleet which carries the UK's Trident nuclear deterrent.
Overseas aid spending will increase in line with the Government's commitment to spend 0.7% of national income on aid.
The Department for International Development's budget will rise from £11.1 billion in 2015-16 (including £1.2 billion of cross-government funding) to £14.2 billion in 2019-20, with £3.1 billion of cross-government funding.
Aid spending will be "reshaped" to support the Government's strategic objectives, including promoting global peace and security and strengthening resilience and response to crises.
Chancellor George Osborne said he was protecting the Foreign Office budget in real terms, with spending of £1.1 billion a year throughout the Spending Review period.
Defence Secretary Michael Fallon said: "National Security is the top priority for this Government.
"This Spending Review will enable us to invest in the cutting edge equipment our world-class armed forces need to keep Britain safe at home and abroad.
"We will increase our 10 year Equipment Programme by £12 Billion and continue to meet the Nato 2% GDP target for the rest of this decade.
"This means more ships, more planes, more troops ready to act, better equipment for Special Forces and more money for cyber."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article