Medical leaders have warned closure of "redundant" facilities is "essential" if NHS Scotland is to make the best use of resources.
The Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh (RCPE) stressed the need for "courageous decisions" based on evidence which disregards "misleading" calls for "more doctors, more nurses, more ambulances and helicopters".
In a written submission to the Scottish Parliament's Health and Sport Committee, the RCPE said NHS Scotland has "much to do" to address effective and efficient use of resources.
It states: "With limited national wealth, decision-makers and influencers must realise that the removal of redundant, although cherished, facilities, practices and remedies is essential.
"There is ample evidence about the right, and most valuable, interventions to prioritise. This involves choice and taking a population approach in proportion to needs.
"The media's focus on exceptions and deficits, and the most vocal advocacy, must have a counter-weight in evidence-informed decision-making, taking judgement on comparative value."
It continues: "There is plenty of evidence, however this is sometimes not in a form that decision-takers feel able to use or within decision-making processes that are robust.
"There is the background of media, public and political expectation that the care services will cope whatever the inputs - 'more doctors, more nurses, more ambulances and helicopters'.
"This is persistently misleading and leads to inappropriate investment decisions and failure to take courageous decisions to set and stick with priorities."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "People are now living longer lives, which means our health and care services must change to aid increasingly more people living with multiple, complex conditions.
"Our ambitions for the NHS are founded on the twin approach of investment and reform.
"We are increasing the NHS revenue budget by £2 billion by the end of this parliament, by which point more than half of frontline spending will be in community health services.
"This year alone we are investing £128 million to help support delivery of service reform."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel