ONLINE jihadist content attracts more clicks in Britain than any other country in Europe, a major new report warns.
Analysts found Islamic State (IS) is still pumping out vast volumes of internet propaganda despite coming under intense military pressure in Iraq and Syria.
Experts say the group produces around 100 pieces of new content in an average week - but this is a conservative estimate.
The in-depth study by think tank Policy Exchange says tens of thousands of users access jihadist material online from all over the globe.
Researchers found the UK was the fifth most frequent location from which content was accessed - after Turkey, the US, Saudi Arabia and Iraq - and registered the largest number of clicks in Europe.
Concerns over the availability of terrorist material such as execution videos and bomb-making instructions on the internet have intensified after Britain was targeted by its fifth terror attack of the year.
In a forward for the paper, former US military chief General David Petraeus highlighted last week's events at Parsons Green.
He said: "The attempted bombing of an underground train in London last Friday - using a device that can be built from instructions available online - merely underscored once again the ever-present nature of this threat."
Gen Petraeus warned that efforts to combat extremism online to now have been "inadequate".
He wrote: "There is no doubting the urgency of this matter. The status quo clearly is unacceptable."
The 131-page assessment finds that the decline of IS - also known as ISIS or Daesh - in the online space has been "significantly overstated".
It says: "For at least a year, the production of content has continued despite the death of key figures, loss of territory and ongoing fighting."
The report details how:
:: In an average week IS produces over one hundred new core articles, videos and newspapers;
:: They are disseminated across a "vast ecosystem" of platforms, file sharing services, websites and social media;
:: IS now uses encrypted messaging service Telegram as the core communication platform for talking to sympathisers;
:: But jihadists have not abandoned other platforms, with content also regularly accessed via Facebook, Google and Twitter;
:: Three in four people (74%) want big internet companies to be more proactive in locating and deleting extremist content, according to a poll.
The paper suggests the Government may wish to consider new laws to counter the possession and consumption of extremist material online.
It also raises the possibility of giving powers to oversee the removal of extremist content to the newly created Commission for Countering Extremism.
Lead author Dr Martyn Frampton said governments and security services have been playing a "fruitless game of 'whack-a-mole'" which is focused on removing individual pieces of content.
He warned: "The evidence suggests that we are not winning the war against online extremism and we need to consider options for change.
"If the internet companies won't do what their customers want and take more responsibility for removing this content, then government must take action through additional regulation and legislation."
Major tech firms have repeatedly faced calls to step up efforts to detect and take down extremist videos and web pages.
This week Prime Minister Theresa May and French President Emmanuel Macron will hold talks to discuss possible new measures.
It emerged earlier this year that Britain and France are looking at plans that could see technology firms face fines if their efforts are not up to scratch.
Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter and YouTube have set up the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism to spearhead efforts to clamp down on extremist content.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel