SCOTLAND’S top police officer is facing a fourth misconduct investigation.
The Police Investigations & Review Commissioner (Pirc) said it had been asked to assess a new allegation levelled against Chief Constable Phil Gormley.
The Pirc is already investigating three allegations of bullying and misconduct against Mr Gormley, who has been on special leave since September.
He has strongly denied misconduct, calling complaints vexatious and opportunistic.
It is understood five complaints had previously been made about Mr Gormley’s conduct to the Scottish Police Authority (SPA), which oversees Police Scotland, three of which were deemed serious enough to be referred to the Pirc, prompting full-blown investigations.
The latest referral is understood to involve a new, sixth complaint against Mr Gormley.
The Pirc said it would assess the allegation “to determine whether the conduct, if proved, would amount to misconduct, gross misconduct or neither and to establish whether an investigation is required”.
The SPA is next due to review whether Mr Gormley can return from leave on January 25.
He almost returned to duty in November, but Justice Secretary Michael Matheson intervened and the SPA board, which initially agreed to a reinstatement, reversed its decision.
The SPA said its referral to the Pirc followed an assessment which determined that, if proven, the allegations would amount to misconduct and require to be investigated.
Former Justice Secretary Kenneth MacAskill has urged Mr Gormley, the Chief Constable since January 2016, to leave and make way for his deputy, Iain Livingstone.
On Tuesday, Mr Livingstone attacked the SPA's conduct in relation to Mr Gormley's aborted return in November.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel