A visitor from outer space identified as the first confirmed interstellar asteroid may have travelled from a binary star system, astronomers believe.
The cigar-shaped object, named 'Oumuamua, was spotted by the Haleakala observatory in Hawaii on October 19 last year.
Its appearance and behaviour baffled scientists and led to speculation that it might even be an alien artefact.
Astronomers now know it was an asteroid, but not one of our own.
'Oumuamua - Hawaiian for "scout" - had entered the solar system from interstellar space after a journey that may have lasted millions of years.
The latest research suggests it was expelled from a binary star system - one with two stars orbiting around each other.
Rocky objects are far more likely to be "kicked out" of their home orbits by binary stars, the scientists found.
In contrast, icy comets, rather than asteroids, were more commonly ejected from lone star systems.
Lead researcher Dr Alan Jackson, from the University of Toronto in Canada, said: "It's remarkable that we've now seen for the first time a physical object from outside our solar system.
"It's really odd that the first object we would see from outside our system would be an asteroid, because a comet would be a lot easier to spot and the solar system ejects many more comets than asteroids."
The research, published in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, suggests that 'Oumuamua originated from a system containing a hot, high mass star.
It may have been cast out some time during the process of planet formation.
When it was discovered, the 400 metre (1,312ft) long object was tumbling and travelling at 30 kilometres per second on a trajectory taking it through and out of the solar system.
At its closest point it passed about 33 million kilometres from Earth.
It appeared to have followed a path roughly in the direction of the star Vega in the southern constellation Lyra.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel