A FORMER classroom assistant has been convicted of taking a bribe during a five-month long money laundering and drug trafficking trial.
First offender 62-year-old Catherine Leahy, of Springboig, Glasgow, is behind bars after a jury found her guilty of accepting an “advantage” to perform her task as a juror “improperly.”
She was the spokeswoman at jury at the High Court in Glasgow which acquitted alleged drug dealer Graham Clarke and others.
The Crown may now seek a retrial of that case.
Yesterday at the High Court in Glasgow judge Lord Turnbull told Leahy: “You took advantage of your public responsibility of jury service and you took a bribe.
“This is conduct which strikes at the heart of the justice system. It is matched in its gravity by its rareness. It is obvious that for such a serious offence only a custodial sentence can be imposed.”
Prosecutor Iain McSporran QC said the Crown’s position is that four amounts of cash paid in to Leahy’s Santander account between April 19 and June 2, 2016, was bribe money.
These sums of £300, £1,000, £1,200 and £330 amounted to £2,830.
Leahy denied that she had been bribed saying in evidence “Absolutely not.”
She claimed the money came from a cheque for £7,446.77 she received from a British Shipbuilders and menage money.
But, the jury did not believe her and after deliberating for three hours found her guilty by majority.
The court heard that the day after the verdict in the Clarke trial the procurator fiscals’ office received a tip-off that members of the jury may have been bribed.
A probe into all the jurors’ finances was ordered at the highest level after suspicion fell on Leahy.
Her Glasgow home was bugged from September 19 to 30, 2016.
The probe into Leahy’s finances was led by Detective Inspector Graeme Everest of the organised crime and counter terrorism financial investigations unit.
High level discussions, including a meeting between the Lord Advocate and Lord President, led to the decision been taken to bug the house Leahy shared with her 22-year-old son Joseph, who was originally on trial with his mother. He walked free when the charges against him were dropped.
The court heard that trawl of jurors’ bank accounts led to one person – Leahy.
Thirty-one conversations between Leahy and her son were recorded by the hidden bug in their home.
At one point Mr Leahy is heard to say: “Mum it wasn’t just you that got bribed so that now when they come to you, you’re a step ahead.”
His mother then said: “There is nothing that can link you with them.”
Leahy is also heard saying that she hopes her son’s car was not bugged and then adds: “That night I went down there nobody could have seen me.”
She served as a juror in the trial of Graham Clarke, his wife Lindsay and others. All the charges against Mr Clarke were not proven and his wife was convicted of mortgage fraud.
The trial ran from November 2, 2015 to April 14, 2016. One juror was dismissed during the trial.
Leahy denied acting improperly as as a juror and taking ‘a bung.” and claimed that when she heard rumours of jury nobbling she treated it as a joke.
The court heard that Leahy did not have a lot of money and had to worked to a strict budget.
The court was told at the time of the trial she had her salary as a classroom assistant and a widow’s pension The judge told the jury: “This has been a most unusual case. I’m not personally aware of a previous case of a juror taking a bribe in the course of a trial.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel