HOLYROOD’S political readers have unanimously welcomed the Herald’s Beyond Brexit series, applauding its ambition and relevance to the national debate over Europe.
Nicola Sturgeon said it was an important contribution to ongoing public discussions.
The First Minister said: “Scotland has benefitted tremendously from our EU membership in terms of trade, skills, funding, people and rights.
Read more: Beyond Brexit - Thinktank urges Scotland-London alliance on Brexit
“Through this Brexit series it is important we hear first-hand the concerns and views of the people of Scotland following the EU referendum, and have a vibrant and open debate about how we can protect Scotland from the Tory Brexit that Scotland did not vote for.
“Given the uncertainty it has raised, it’s crucial that we collectively work to maintain our strong links with our trading partners in the EU and beyond.”
Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson was equally complimentary, saying: "The decision to leave the European Union raises many questions of politics, economics, constitution and law. It is right that these questions are examined soberly and in detail.
“The Herald's Beyond Brexit series seeks to do that, so it should be welcomed. We all have a duty to engage and endeavour to achieve the best deal for the whole UK going forward."
Several party leaders welcomed the light being shone on the myriad complexities of Brexit.
Read more: Beyond Brexit - Thinktank urges Scotland-London alliance on Brexit
Scottish Labour leader Kezia Dugdale said: “The Herald is to be commended for its Beyond Brexit series. Already this has provided insightful coverage, which will help readers understand the complexities of the situation we now find ourselves in as a result of the Tories’ reckless Brexit gamble.
“There are no easy answers, and hopefully this series will be able to provide a number of options for Scotland and Britain’s future.
“Like the majority of Scots, my party believes it is vital for Scotland’s future economic security that we continue to have access to the EU single market even after Brexit takes effect.
“But the UK single market is even more important, and it would be an act of economic vandalism if the SNP holds a second independence referendum.”
Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie said: “Brexit poses the biggest economic threat that the UK has ever seen. It is therefore good to see the Herald treat is so seriously.
“Readers see, with every day that unfolds, the unanswered questions on how a UK outside the EU will really look.”
Scottish Green Co-convener Patrick Harvie added: “Given the complex nature of Brexit, the Herald is to be applauded for seeking to shed light on the serious challenges and potential opportunities Scotland faces.
Read more: Beyond Brexit - Thinktank urges Scotland-London alliance on Brexit
“We know that a hard Brexit would cause huge damage to our economy, to our public services and universities, and to the lives of a great many individual citizens.
“The suggestions being put forward, such as those around maintaining free movement of people, have credibility and should be explored further.
“The Herald couldn’t have put it better: Scotland voted to remain in the EU and ways must be found to respect that decision.”
Ukip MEP David Coburn said: “I think the project has tremendous merit. It’s good that we are discussing these things in Scotland. It’s a matter of great importance. The SNP have tended to stifle discussion on Brexit as much as they possibly can. But it’s going to happen.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel