CREDITORS of failed firm McClure Naismith have been warned that they are unlikely to receive any money when the firm is eventually dissolved.
In his progress report for the six months to the end of February joint administrator Tom MacLennan, a partner at FRP Advisory, said that while he and fellow administrator Iain Fraser had managed to recover £855,000 since being appointed in August 2015 the cost of doing so was £790,000.
As the initial 12-month period of administration, which was extended by 12 months last August, is expected to hit three years in total, Mr MacLennan said there was unlikely to be any money left to distribute at the end of the period.
“As a result of the additional time and increased legal costs incurred dealing with the fragmentation of the [partnership] and the transfer of clients and client files to firms not party to sale agreements, together with lower than anticipated realisations from debtors and work in progress, it is unlikely that there will be a distribution to any class of creditor,” he said.
So far the administrators have recovered just over £720,000 of the money owed to the firm by clients and just £114,000 for legal work that McClure Naismith had already carried out but had not billed clients for.
The firm, which at the time of going into administration was led by chairman Robin Shannan, appointed Mr MacLennan and Mr Fraser after suffering several years of spiralling costs and stagnating revenues.
While around 80 of its partners and staff found homes at firms including Burness Paull, Harper Macleod, Maclay Murray & Spens, and Wright Johnston & Mackenzie, 40 were ultimately made redundant.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here