UN investigators are looking into allegations against 14 of the 19 staff from the UN relief agency for Palestinians who Israel claims were involved in the October 7 attack by Hamas militants that spurred the latest war in Gaza, a spokesman said.
The announcement by UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric provided the first information on the investigation ordered by secretary-general Antonio Guterres.
The UN’s internal watchdog – the Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) – is carrying out the probe following Israel’s initial allegations in January.
The watchdog reported that of the 19 allegations against UNRWA agency staff, one case was closed because Israel provided no evidence and four others were suspended for lack of sufficient evidence, Mr Dujarric said.
The United Nations was informed in January of Israeli allegations that 12 employees of the agency known as UNRWA had taken part in the October 7 attack on southern Israel, when Hamas and other Palestinian militants killed about 1,200 people and seized some 250 as hostages.
The agency had at the time terminated the contracts of all those employees.
Mr Dujarric said the UN later received additional allegations from Israel about seven UNRWA staff – five in March and two in April.
A separate, independent review of UNRWA’s neutrality led by former French foreign minister Catherine Colonna was released on Monday.
It said Israel had never before expressed concerns about anyone on the staff lists that UNRWA had given Israel every year since 2011.
UNRWA has 32,000 staff in Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and the Palestinian territories, including 13,000 in Gaza who provide education, healthcare, food and other services to several million Palestinians and their families.
The agency’s head, Philippe Lazzarini, said on Tuesday that nearly 180 UNRWA staff have been killed during the Israeli offensive in Gaza, which has killed more than 34,000 Palestinians, around two-thirds of them children and women, according to the Health Ministry in Gaza, which does not differentiate between civilians and fighters.
Israel’s original allegations led to the suspension of contributions to UNRWA by the United States, its biggest donor, and more than a dozen other countries, causing a pause in funding worth about 450 million dollars, according to Ms Colonna’s report.
A number of countries have since resumed contributions, but the US Congress has suspended any money for the agency until March 2025.
Mr Dujarric on Friday reiterated Mr Guterres’ appeal to donors to support UNRWA generously.
Mr Lazzarini, the agency’s commissioner general, says UNRWA has enough money to operate only through June.
Mr Dujarric pointed out that UNRWA had released the original information about the Israeli allegations and called for the independent review of its neutrality.
Ms Colonna’s 48-page report said UNRWA has “robust” procedures to uphold the UN principle of neutrality but cited serious gaps in implementation.
It made 50 recommendations to improve UNRWA’s neutrality, which Mr Guterres and Mr Lazzarini have pledged to implement.
Mr Dujarric said the OIOS has not given any indication when its investigation of the 14 staff would be completed, not did he elaborate on the allegations.
He told reporters that OIOS investigators had met with Israeli authorities and would visit again in May.
“These discussions are continuing and … have enabled progress on the investigations,” Mr Dujarric said.
Of the 12 initial cases, eight remain under investigation, he said.
Three cases have been suspended and one staff member has been cleared.
The UN “is exploring corrective administration action”, Mr Dujarric said.
UNRWA’s Mr Lazzarini said on Tuesday that anyone cleared by the OIOS would be reinstated.
Of the seven additional cases brought to the UN’s attention after January, Mr Dujarric said six remain under investigation and one has been suspended pending additional information.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel