Cutting air passenger duty (APD) in Scotland could help save some tourism businesses from closure, a Holyrood committee has been told.
The industry is facing an unprecedented rise in costs and many firms are at risk of going under, the Scottish Tourism Alliance (STA) said.
Scottish Government plans to slash air tax by 50% could be part of a "rescue package" by helping boost visitor numbers, it added.
The reduction in the levy will begin when a Scottish replacement to APD is introduced in April 2018, and will be delivered in full by the end of this Parliament.
Ministers hope reducing the tax, and eventually abolishing it, will increase the number of direct flights to and from Scotland.
Cuts to the duty have been welcomed by Scottish Chambers of Commerce, the Scottish Chambers of Development and Industry (SCDI) and the STA, which gave evidence to the Finance Committee on the Air Departure Tax (Scotland) Bill - which will replace APD.
STA chair Stephen Leckie said: "The massive uplift in costs for this industry may mean that some businesses in tourism will close, they just can't afford to keep their doors open - it's as blunt and simple as that.
"Part of the potential rescue package might be that if we pour more visitors into Scotland we can increase our yield and our revenue, and that might be enough to save and rescue some businesses."
Mr Leckie said increasing costs include a "significant rise" in business rates, and higher energy and food and drink prices.
Some businesses have reported a 20% rise in costs for food and drink alone, he added.
"The impact of the living wage, the impact of the apprenticeship levy, this industry has never faced such tough times in terms of costs," he continued.
"Revenue growth is our big challenge."
The Tourism Strategy 2020 aims to achieve an overnight visitor spend of between £5.5 billion and £6.5 billion by 2020, generating an additional £1 billion or more.
The industry is currently £300 million short of achieving this, Mr Leckie said.
"The chief executive of Edinburgh Airport indicated that if the Air Departure Tax were reduced by 50% it would soak that up by 2020, if that decision was made back then a year ago."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here