The allocation of blame for driverless car crashes is being reviewed.
Scenarios in which a human or manufacturer will be deemed responsible for accidents form part of a three-year study into the legal obstacles to the development and use of self-driving vehicles.
The need for new criminal offences to deal with conduct and interference in relation to driverless cars will also be assessed.
Driving laws must be adjusted to accommodate a future in which some vehicles will not have a traditional driver or even a steering wheel, according to the Department for Transport.
Chancellor Philip Hammond revealed in November last year that he wants full driverless cars on UK roads by 2021.
Roads minister Jesse Norman said: “The UK is a world-leader for self-driving vehicle research and development, and this work marks an important milestone in our continued commitment to the technology.
“With driving technology advancing at an unprecedented rate, it is important that our laws and regulations keep pace so that the UK can remain one of the world leaders in this field.”
Mr Norman launched the legal study on a visit to the Gateway project in Greenwich, south-east London.
The scheme will see a fleet of autonomous pods provide a shuttle service to investigate public reaction to self-driving vehicles.
The review of driving laws is being conducted by the Law Commission of England and Wales and the Scottish Law Commission as part of the Government’s Industrial Strategy.
Law Commissioner Nicholas Paines QC said: “British roads are already among the safest in the world and automated vehicles have the potential to make them even safer, provided our laws are ready for them.
“We’ll now start consulting widely on how the law should work with this new technology and develop reforms which develop the use of self-driving vehicles in the years to come.”
Scottish Law Commissioner Caroline Drummond said: “Automated vehicles could have a big impact on the way we live and work so it’s important that, UK-wide, we have a legal system which can accommodate them.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel