Singer Barry Manilow has spoken about his marriage and sexuality for the first time after fearing his fans would be disappointed if they knew he was gay.
The private star, 73, kept his sexuality hidden for decades but said he has been moved by the “beautiful” reaction of his supporters since news of his wedding to manager Garry Kief broke in 2015.
(Yui Mok/PA)
The couple have been together for nearly 40 years but Barry has only now spoken about his husband.
He told People magazine: “I’m so private. I always have been. I thought I would be disappointing them if they knew I was gay. So I never did anything.”
The couple married in a secret ceremony in Palm Springs, California, in April 2014, and in 2015 news of their marriage and Barry’s sexuality made headlines.
(PA Wire)
The singer, best known for hits including Mandy and Copacabana, said the revelation was “a blessing and a curse” and he received an outpouring of support from fans.
He said: “When they found out that Garry and I were together, they were so happy. The reaction was so beautiful – strangers commenting, ‘Great for you!’ I’m just so grateful for it.”
Barry was briefly previously married to his high school sweetheart Susan Deixler and said he was not struggling with his sexuality while they were married.
(PA)
He told the magazine: “I was out making music every night, sowing my wild oats – I was too young. I wasn’t ready to settle down.”
In 1978 he met Garry, saying of the executive: “I knew that this was it. I was one of the lucky ones. I was pretty lonely before that.
“He’s the smartest person I’ve ever met in my life – and a great guy, too.”
However, the relationship was not without obstacles, with Barry saying Garry struggled with their relationship after attending a concert.
He said: “I got into the car with him, and (the fans) were rocking the car. He was like, ‘I can’t handle this. It’s not for me.’ I’m glad he stayed.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel