Matt Damon has said he wishes he had “listened a lot more” before he commented on the Hollywood sexual harassment scandal.
The Good Will Hunting star was met with a barrage of criticism for his comments that the issue encompasses “a spectrum of behaviour”.
Appearing on US morning show Today, Damon apologised and said he did not want to increase anyone’s pain.
The actor, 47, previously told Popcorn With Peter Travers, on ABC News, that not all men in the industry should be painted with the same brush.
“I would like to point out that, even though it feels like there’s this avalanche of men, how many people in the movie business have taken a tumble now?
“Think of how many men are in the movie business … this is like 1% of the guys, it’s not everybody, it just feels like it,” he said.
Discussing the scandal that has engulfed the industry since allegations arose against movie mogul Harvey Weinstein, he told the show: “We’re in this watershed moment and I think it’s great. It’s wonderful that women are feeling empowered to tell their stories and it’s totally necessary.”
But he added: “I do believe that there’s a spectrum of behaviour and we’re going to have to figure, you know, there’s a difference between, patting someone on the butt and rape or child molestation.
“Both of those behaviours need to be confronted and eradicated without question, but they shouldn’t be conflated.”
Weinstein denies allegations of non-consensual sex.
Cher, Alyssa Milano and his Good Will Hunting co-star and ex-girlfriend Minnie Driver were among those to criticise Damon for his comments.
Asked what he learned from the backlash, he told Today: “I really wish I’d listened a lot more before I weighed in on this.
“I don’t want to further anybody’s pain with anything that I do or say. So for that I am really sorry.
“Time’s Up and a lot of those women are my dear friends and I love them and respect them and support what they’re doing and want to be a part of that change and want to go along for the ride but I should get in the back seat and close my mouth for a while.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here