Glasgow City Council proudly appointed its first “transparency tsar” earlier this week.
A wheeze of the new SNP leadership, the independent auditor’s job is to sniff out any suspect deals struck under the previous Labour regime.
But evidence given to stunned members of Holyrood’s local government committee suggests the council’s instinct remains for keeping people in the dark.
In the wake of the Grenfell tower tragedy, councils across the country checked local social housing for combustible cladding.
In Glasgow, there was a clean bill of health and all concerned were quick to trumpet the result.
The council then moved on to checking blocks of private flats. It completed its trawl of building warrants and other written records a few weeks ago. This time, the news was unwelcome.
A number of high-rises had combustible aluminium composite material (ACM) cladding akin to Grenfell.
It was of sufficient concern for the council to pass its findings to the Scottish ministerial working group on fire safety set up in June.
But that was the extent of the council’s communication efforts.
It did not, shamefully, tell the residents of the blocks concerned. It did not, inexplicably, even contact the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service directly.
Instead, as Raymond Barlow, the council’s assistant head of planning and building standards, told MSPs, the council handed over its report to ministers and effectively sat on its hands.
Or, as he put it: “We’re simply saying we’re supplying the information to Scottish ministers and then we wish to see what they wish to do with the information before we take it further.”
Mr Barlow also refused to tell MSPs the extent of the problem, saying he was “wary” about naming the high rises concerned.
The impression was of one public body glad to be relieved of the burden of action by passing the buck to another public body.
In theory, because the ministerial group includes the fire service, commanders should have become aware of the cladding.
But the Scottish Government later revealed the findings from Glasgow had not been detailed enough to inform any decisions, and did not say how many properties were affected.
Under heavy criticism, the council finally admitted it had found 57 private properties with some ACM in their construction, some with it “as a substantial part of their make-up”.
It said no building appeared to be a particular fire risk, and it did not want to sow panic.
But, as committee convener Bob Doris said, the discovery of any combustible cladding was “deeply concerning”, and residents deserved to be told.
One emerging theme of Grenfell is the off-hand way the authorities dealt with residents.
Glasgow City Council may not have a landlord duty to the residents of private flats, but it has a duty to act with basic common sense and not cover up the facts.
You do not need a transparency tsar to see it has signally failed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here