NOT before time, the proliferation of the split infinitive in spoken English and its almost tripling since the early 1990s is announced by researchers. ("To actually split an infinitive on the increase," The Herald, September 25).
Instances are encountered almost daily in utterances by politicians and public figures and others in the news reported on television and radio and in newspapers. These split infinitives jar. Many are awkward and ugly.
Sometimes its use can be justified. Famous authors have split the infinitive, and there are examples to be found in literature, the aim usually being to express meaning more effectively. Nevertheless, the majority of split infinitives that I have noticed bring a shudder.
Recent books on good grammar tend to advise that a split infinitive should be avoided if possible and this can be done by rewriting a sentence. One way is for the intervening word that comes between "to" and the verb to be moved elsewhere.
The incident that started the epidemic was the narrated introduction to each Star Trek episode, "to boldly go where no-one has gone before". It could be altered to "to go boldly where no-one has gone before". This form, I would say, expresses the purpose better because the important word is "boldly" and it is given the emphasis intended. The same method can be applied to statements now in preparation for public consumption.
Christopher Reekie,
12 Orchard Drive, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel