LIKE Frank McGee (Letters, March 19), I have had excellent experience of the services provided by the NHS. However, when attending hospital the strain on those services created by the sheer number of people of all ages in the consultancy waiting areas of the hospitals was obvious. Serious conditions require early attention from experienced consultants, but I wonder whether overworked doctors are becoming too ready to refer patients to consultants for second and third opinions, or is it simply that we as a nation are becoming less and less healthy?
My recollection of the distant past was that referrals to consultants were few and far between, whereas now it seems to be a routine part of the NHS procedure which generates more and more pressure on the NHS. This is illustrated by Mr McGee’s experience involving consulting his GP , then his health centre, then the Royal Infirmary, then the Queen Elizabeth hospital and finally Gartnavel Hospital where at last a treatment plan was put into action. I do not criticise the NHS for all of this care and attention but wonder whether it is all necessary or if any shortcuts in such referrals might be possible to relieve some of the overall pressure on the NHS ?
Alan Fitzpatrick,
10 Solomon’s View, Dunlop.
It was good to read of the care provided within the NHS to reader Frank McGee at a time when the service is subject to adverse criticism.
Mr McGee comments that he received exemplary service, from the car park attendant to "even the pharmacy".
As an integral part of the NHS, one would expect nothing less from the those providing a pharmacy service whether within the hospital, or within the community.
Malcolm Allan (former pharmacist),
2 Tofthill Gardens, Bishopbriggs.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here