CAN I suggest that anyone who is shocked by the alleged illegal use of Facebook data to influence voting patterns in the 2016 presidential election (“Chief of data firm is suspended in row over secret filming allegations”, The Herald, March 21) must have had their head buried deep in the sand. The claim by Facebook that its company policy had been compromised is laughable.
In 2013 Democratic senator Maxine Waters appeared on national US television and boasted that in the 2012 presidential election Barack Obama had a database of a scale and depth ever before known. Subsequently a former member of the Obama campaign declared that once Facebook discovered what was going on it had a meeting with the campaign but did not stop the information mining because "they were on the same side".
Profiling of voters is nothing new. After all, remember Tony Blair in 1997 used specifically targeted voter groups in marginal constituencies to influence the results of the General Election. The only difference is that the quantity of information available because of social media is vastly greater.
There is also the suspicion that governments are desperate to reduce the impact of social media in sharing information they would rather keep hidden. It is more difficult to control information if everyone has a smartphone. In a coup it is no longer simply a matter of taking over the TV station to stem the flow of information.
The individual is responsible for the amount of information about themselves they make available online. People should be aware that they are much more easily manipulated if they rely on government controlled media or tycoon-controlled press with a specific agenda for their "factual information"
David Stubley,
22 Templeton Crescent, Prestwick.
APPALLING (and sleazy) as Cambridge Analytics’ behaviour is –or was ¬– I am puzzled by the hysteria over Facebook.
Not being a teenager or someone who thinks food needs to be photographed for posterity before it can be digested, I have never had a Facebook account. However, even a Luddite like me finds it odd that anyone using Facebook thought their data was not being harvested. Exposing the guts of your life online and expecting that a free-to-use platform is not gleaning something is like eating burgers six times a day and being surprised you get fat or smoking and being surprised that you end up with lung cancer.
How lovely it would be if the same politicians who are on the current slam-social-media bandwagon had shifted themselves over the decades while Joe Public was being fed bilge by the gutter press – paving the way for, among other things, Brexit.
Amanda Baker,
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel