AFTER reading Rosemary Goring's excellent article on the demise of Cardinal O'Brien ("Cardinal O'Brien's tale was a betrayal of hope and trust", The Herald, March 21) I then was completely surprised by the letter (March 21) from the CND stalwart Bruce Kent, who referred to him as his "friend".
Ms Goring emphasised the unresolved issues of the Cardinal's victims and the ineffective handling of his deviant actions by the Vatican hierarchy downwards.
Monsignor Kent does not want the Cardinal's support for nuclear disarmament to be forgotten, while acknowledging his lack of "sexual standards", omitting to add that the Cardinal only admitted his guilt after being forced to do so because of the overwhelming claims.
While condemning nuclear disarmament the Cardinal was simultaneously condemning homosexual acts and gay marriages.
His empty rhetoric must have been so easy for him to deliver during the decades in which he led his double life for his own perverse satisfaction.
In this instance I think we should agree with Shakespeare and let the "good" be interred with the bones, if only in an attempt to gain closure for his victims.
Tina Oakes,
Hanover Court, Stonehaven.
I FOUND the article by Rosemary Goring to be hard in condemnation, but sadly vacuous with any grain of compassion or insight into a man so tragically conflicted. It took the Letters Pages to lift my spirit with the balanced and more kindly contribution from Bruce Kent with a timely reminder, to me at least, that there is bad even in the best of us.
A betrayal of trust? Perhaps. Hope? Never, I hope.
James Devine.
Birch Knowe, Bishopbriggs.
IN response to Bruce Kent's letter regarding Cardinal Keith O'Brien, I wonder if any of the victims of his chosen abuse wish to acknowledge the good he did and to pray that he may rest in peace.
Laurence Wade,
11 Shaw Place, Coylton, Ayr.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel