MARCH 3, 1953, three months before the Coronation. The man who rang the Glasgow Herald at midnight, speaking with an educated Scottish voice, said that posters were being put up across the city at that very moment, and would be all over Scotland by morning, offering a £2,000 reward for information “leading to the identification of Elizabeth 1 of Scotland, dead or alive.”
This was an issue at the time. One Scots Labour MP said that “numbers of people in Scotland, and not the Scottish Nationalists alone” were “deeply concerned about what they consider to be the unjustified use of ‘Elizabeth II’. He and some colleagues wanted the Commons to reject the Royal Titles Bill as it did not “provide for a historically accurate royal title for Scotland.”
The Edinburgh Conservative MP, Sir William Darling publicly supported ‘Elizabeth II’ as the new title. He received a live machine-gun bullet wrapped in cotton wool, and the offer of police protection. At Renfrew County Council a move was made to disapprove of the cipher ‘E II R’ on 52,000 Coronation souvenir tins of toffees.
On March 4 this paper reported that the “Scottish Republican Army” had warned that unless a “certain sign” was removed - the wording on the Royal Scots Memorial in Edinburgh, which mentioned ‘Queen Elizabeth II’ - it would again mobilise. On March 6 the Herald said two men had been questioned by police in relation to the Scottish National Congress ‘reward’ posters.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel