I DO not often find myself in agreement with the Labour Party nowadays, but the recent proposal by Tom Watson, its Deputy Leader, to outlaw "in-play" betting adverts, gets almost my full support ("Labour would ban in-play betting adverts, says Watson", The Herald, September 20). I say almost, because I in turn would propose a complete ban on the advertising of betting. My opinion is not based on any moral judgment, but is purely in the interests of the common good.
Since alcohol and tobacco advertising is banned, because it is deemed to be injurious to health and wellbeing, then surely excessive gambling must also fall into this category. I have seen too many instances of good people falling into the gambling trap, with the resultant loss of businesses or jobs, homes and in some cases families, therefore anything which encourages this pitfall, such as advertising, should not only be discouraged but should not be allowed.
I realise that thousands of folks enjoy a harmless flutter on sports, such as horse racing and football, with no harmful effects to their lives or to that of their dependants, however they do not require to be pressurised into any further involvement beyond that. Tantalising, mind-bending and relentless promotions such as so-called "free" betting shots can easily tempt the unwary to become more heavily involved and as losses mount they may then turn to unscrupulous loan services to become even further embroiled in a downward spiral into financial disaster.
For such advertising to carry a very fleeting, innocuous and worthless tag line to the effect that "if the fun stops, stop", is a very poor compliance with regulations, which I am certain has no effect whatsoever.
I am quite sure that some will argue that the state is equally guilty with its promotion of the National Lottery; that is for a separate debate, but neither should it be ignored.
Ian Cooper,
Flat 3/3, 1 Jackson Place, Bearsden.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here