BOTH Ian W Thomson and Angus MacDonald (Letters, November 7) lament the extent of foreign ownership of Highland estates. They see this as being a bad thing, whereas most of the evidence points to it having been beneficial to the local economy, to communities and to the natural environment.
Mr MacDonald refers to “Highland lairds (who)… employ Highlanders and are embedded in their community”. It’s a nice thought, but that hasn’t been a common situation since the days of the clan chieftains of the 18th century. Even then, the chieftains were as likely to be found in the salons of Edinburgh or the outposts of Empire as in their ancestral homes.
Since at least Victorian times, Highland Scotland has been owned largely by wealthy families whose businesses were elsewhere. The estates were holiday homes, where they could indulge their passion for hunting and shooting; Queen Victoria has a lot to answer for here. As family fortunes declined, many estates were run on a shoestring, with no investment, deteriorating buildings and declining employment. When the family funds became too straitened and the estates were put up for sale, it has often been foreigners who purchased them.
Highland Scotland is one of the finest wilderness areas in Europe; indeed, the world. It’s entirely understandable that visitors have fallen in love with the area and some wealthy individuals have purchased tracts of it. Generally, these foreign buyers have invested in their estates, improving the environment, renovating buildings and generating employment in areas where job opportunities are few and far between. The biggest threat to Highland Scotland has been the power companies and, sadly, our own Government, who have between them conspired to make industrial wind farms a near-ubiquitous experience.
Doug Maughan,
52 Menteith View, Dunblane.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel