IAN W Thomson's suggestion (Letters, December 11) that the Scottish Labour Party should follow the example of its Irish counterpart in 1918 and commit hari-kari in the interests of Scottish independence is at least an interesting and novel one. That, a century ago he tells us, helped "produced a huge majority for independence across most of Ireland". Let us corrects a couple of his errors.
The election of 1918 in Ireland did give Sinn Fein 73 out of 101 parliamentary seats which it used as a mandate to declare independence. However, this was achieved on a minority – 47 per cent – of the popular vote across Ireland, which figure itself distorted Sinn Fein support. In many areas of western Ireland Sinn Fein was already a parallel authority and its supporters obeyed its instructions to "Vote early and vote often". Electoral fraud and intimidation were widespread. On a referendum, Irish independence would have been lost. But that is now by the by.
As to Labour's position on Scotland it is now, as I understand it, as it always was, support for home rule, not independence.
Now to those former Labour politicians whom Mr Thomson cites from beyond the grave, claiming who would support independence today.
Keir Hardie and James Maxton remained in the Labour Party and remained supporters of home rule, or what we call today devolution. The two others cited who moved to support independence, John Maclean and RB Cunningham Graham, left the Labour Party. All four had consistent positions.
If the SNP cannot – as increasingly looks likely – deliver independence, it should not expect that other parties who never have done so, should come to its support, and commit political suicide.
What happened to the Irish Labour Party after 1918?
Ian R Mitchell,
21 Woodside Terrace, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel