IT is easy to sympathise with English rail commuters whose daily journeys have been disrupted by industrial action, the chaotic launch of new timetables, “broken-down trains” and a host of other causes. One London newspaper, referring to the impending 3.1 per cent rise in fares in England and Wales, says that 2018 has been the worst year for rail disruption in a decade.
No-one pretends that the situation in Scotland is as bad as that in England, but too many Scottish commuters are left frustrated and irritated by cancelled trains and botched launch of timetables, and with only the most cursory of apologies in return.
The new “enhanced” winter timetable led to numerous disruptions and delays, exacerbated by another fault with ScotRail’s flagship new Class 385 electric trains. Problems about repeated cancellations on, for example, the Helensburgh and Tweedbank lines, will strike a chord with frustrated commuters everywhere. Many have complained about the new-look service between Edinburgh and Dunblane. The Office of Rail and Road is holding Network Rail Scotland to account “for delivery of its regulated performance targets” after disclosures that Network Rail was responsible for two in three of the delays which forced ScotRail to settle 65,000 passenger claims in nine months.
The ScotRail Alliance pledge to give Scotland its best-ever railway won’t, of course, be achieved overnight. Yes, most trains do arrive on time; and yes, the latest figures show that ScotRail punctuality improved (by 0.1% on the same period last year). But too many commuters are demonstrably weary of being fobbed off with ScotRail tweeting self-conscious apologies for delays and cancellations. The fare rises will test patience further still. Some feel that transport secretary Michael Matheson should speak up more often on commuters’ behalf. And if the private monopoly that runs our trains feels it could be more pro-active in listening and responding to its customers, so much the better.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here