THE Scottish Government seems determined to have Abellio stripped of its franchise at the earliest opportunity, come what may (“SNP hunt for operator of last resort in case ScotRail deal is axed”, The Herald, January 10).
Regardless of the merits or demerits of the present set-up and just how any resultant operation can be funded from the public purse if that is the outcome, remains to be seen. However, £5 million is being made available to have experts come forward to offer their expertise in how to run and operate rail services in what might be regarded as “in the meantime” pending, as it would appear, public sector bidding for the ScotRail franchise post 2025.
None of this will result in betterment unless and until service operators, public or private, are integrated and act in cohesion with Network Rail.
For the present, much of the angst of daily cancellations could have been avoided if ScotRail had simply taken services out of the advertised timetables and not left them to be dealt with as and when on a daily basis. In simple terms, run whatever can be provided with the staff and train crew available to do so. Duties such as driver training should have been over and above the daily workload.
In due course such withdrawn services could be reinstated when, it is hoped, more normal times and conditions return.
John Macnab,
175 Grahamsyke Street,
Laurieston,
Falkirk.
I WISH the Scottish Government would stop politicising the performance targets of Abellio.
Anyone looking into the reasons for the present situation will find that the “back-of-the-breakfast-cereal-box children’s-maze puzzle” leads straight back to Holyrood.
Transport Scotland and Network Rail bear the brunt of the responsibility for Abellio’s performance due in the main to insisting on undeliverable performance figures in the first place; ordering new trains that could never have been delivered on time; and to the abject failure to provide infrastructure improvements on the dates agreed. (Edinburgh to Glasgow electrification and ineffective sea wall storm protection improvements on the Saltcoats to Stevenson line, for instance.)
The Scottish Government’s should concentrate on assisting Abellio to secure the best service available, given the above parameters, instead of issuing unwarranted threats it must know would not not hold water if Abellio used litigation as its “operation of last resort”.
Archie Burleigh,
Meigle, Skelmorlie.
NICE to see ScotRail offering customers disrupted by poor service free trips on six weekends as compensation (“ScotRail offers free train travel”, The Herald, January 8). Suppose that, due to engineering works, it will be on the replacement bus service. Cynical, me?
Steve Barnet,
Broom Park, Gargunnock.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here