BOTH Brian Quail and Margaret Forbes (Letters, January 14) write very clear arguments against nuclear armaments, citing the bombing of two Japanese cities which encouraged the end of Japan fighting in the Second World War.
I suggest however that had Japan not been forced to surrender to the Americans and instead, we in the West had stood back and let Russia do the final act of war, it would have been a massacre. Apart from any other fact, Russia was unlikely to have forgiven Japan in 1945 for the Russo-Japanese war of 40 years earlier.
The rather honourable end to the war in the Pacific which was the surrender signing aboard the USS Missouri is not something I could possibly imagine if Russia was responsible for the final ending of the war. Additionally we only have to consider their actions in taking Berlin to imagine what they would have done in invading Japan.
I am certain that the post-war rebuilding of Japan would not have happened if Russia had been the sole occupying nation.We would have seen asset stripping on a massive scale and the population reduced to serfdom. The rising sun emblem on the flag replaced with the hammer and sickle.
The fact that nuclear bombs fell on Hiroshima and Nagasaki does not seem to me the most relevant argument on this issue as by that stage in the war many more Japanese workers could have been killed continuing the US strategic saturation bombing with high explosives. In the Second World War at least as many living in Japan were killed by conventional bombs as nuclear. I am convinced, however, that the nuclear bombing provided a much-needed shock to Japan and on balance it may well have saved many lives.
Bill Brown,
46 Breadie Drive, Milngavie.
WILLIAM Scott (Letters, January 9) is completely correct. Nevertheless, I can’t think his comments would suffer from minor amplification.
Japan instituted a nuclear programme in the mid-1930s, the main objective being a weapon, using fission and chain reaction. By early in the war, they were working on the separation of Uranium 235. We were merely fortunate that “ours” was ready first.
Given Japan’s thoroughly well known conduct in all theatres and aspects of the Second World War, is it really fanciful conjecture to imagine that they wouldn’t have used it on us? Presumably then, we should have refrained and meekly offered ourselves for a slaughter of similar magnitude?
Germany of course also had a nuclear programme (Norway – deuterium and so on) but fortunately had been subdued before the development (and V2) had come to fruition.
I loathe war and all that’s concomitant with it and I find cold-blooded weapons research disgusting. I weep for the men and women who were killed (60 million in the Second World War) or maimed and their families, but I have never heard an argument for pacifism that would hold water.
Mike Pattison,
Ardchoil, Rowardennan, Glasgow
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel