By Jane Wright, Chair of the Scotland Foster Care Workers Branch of IWGB
THE Fostering Network’s State of the Nation survey, released this week, painted a picture of a demoralised, under resourced, and underappreciated workforce. We foster because we want to do the best for the children in our care. However, this hard work and the altruism of foster care workers has been exploited for too long and it’s time we are given the dignity of a properly regulated workforce.
The survey aimed to uncover information about foster care workers, including what are we being paid, support we receive, and how we feel about our role. Remarkably, there is no national body that collects this data and regulates our practice. As the Foster Care Workers Branches of the Independent Workers’ Union of Great Britain, we have established the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Foster Care Work to fix this.
You might well be asking why is this necessary? Surely foster carers are just parents for children who cannot be looked after by their own families? On a very basic level, yes, that is our role, but it is so much more complicated than that. In most situations, foster carers do not hold parental rights for the children in their care, meaning that even the simplest decisions around school trips or sleepovers have to be agreed by the child’s social worker.
The majority of children who are accommodated by the state have a parent with addiction issues, leaving them at risk of neglect or abuse. These early life experiences often impact on a child’s development, leading to social, emotional, and mental health problems which can take years of therapeutic care to overcome. This recovery needs foster carers who are skilled and trained. Add to that the need to input into children’s hearings, looked after children meetings, educational plans and other forums and it becomes apparent that this is much more than just “parenting”.
In this context, issues can arise that question a carer’s fitness to foster, which are currently dealt with with little or no external scrutiny. We urgently need a fair, transparent, and independent way to determine whether a foster carer is fit for the role. This is why we are proposing a Foster Care Workers Council to be the governing body of the profession with the aim of maintaining, improving and, ultimately, enforcing professional standards and ensuring, so far as is reasonably practicable, universal best practices.
This new governing body will prevent the useless duplication of processes that happens across Scotland. All of the 32 local authorities and 22 Independent Fostering Agencies have their own teams who recruit, assess, approve, train, and deregister foster care workers. Not only is this expensive, but it also means that foster carers are “owned” by their assessing fostering service. Moving to another involves repeating the assessment process which takes at least six months to complete.
Last year, Glasgow City Council had 40 fostering families with empty beds, as fewer children needed care. Many of these families live in South Lanarkshire, yet worked for Glasgow council. At the same time, the council in South Lanarkshire needed to find spaces for fostering, but due to the current situation, they could not be matched with these families even though they lived in the same town. The Foster Care Worker’s Council would address this, giving foster carers the option to work for different local authorities or fostering providers, standardising approval and training.
Despite these problems, we continue to work around the clock to do our best for the children we have taken into our families. To carry on that work, we need the support of an independent regulatory body.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here