HELEN Blackburn (Letters, February 15), like my good lady wife, abhors the prevalence of spitting during football matches. Though I sympathise with her view, I must confess that I am guilty of such behaviour myself whilst playing football though I have never, to the best of my knowledge, spat in a blatant manner but because I urgently felt the need to do so.
Several studies have shown that vigorous exercise, such as football (even in my case), increases the amount of protein secreted into the saliva, especially a kind of mucus called MUC5B. Apparently this mucus makes the saliva thicker, which makes it harder to swallow, so we are obliged to spit it out.
I agree that it makes for less than pleasant viewing but there are sound biological reasons for footballers' sputum desideratum.
Owen Kelly,
8 Dunvegan Drive, Stirling.
DEAR oh dear. Helen Blackburn is revolted by the expulsion of excess saliva and unwanted phlegm by footballers and managers by spitting during televised matches.
Doubtless she is equally repelled by the old fashioned nose-clearing technique of the thumb on the nostril and blowing, both procedures being necessary to improve breathing. The compulsory use of handkerchiefs would be a genteel solution, but we would then be subjected to endless slow-motion replays and analysis by pundits to decide whether or not the volume of offending matter merited a nose-blowing stoppage. In the meantime, your correspondent could always switch off.
Duncan Macintyre,
2 Fort Matilda Terrace, Greenock.
ASSUREDLY Helen Blackburn is not the only armchair viewer who deplores the anti-social antics in screened football matches. Equally nauseating is the act of players gulping from plastic bottles to then spew their entire intake on the playing surface.
Nowadays sport and in particular football clubs are dependent on income from TV coverage. Match audiences, whether at the stadia or at home, are entitled to better conduct in and around the field of play.
Allan C Steele,
22 Forres Avenue, Giffnock.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel